Revitalizing Ministry: Healthy vs. Unhealthy Churches
Revitalizing Ministry: Healthy vs. Unhealthy Churches
In a world increasingly shaped by individualism—think iPhones, iPads, and the aptly named “Me Generation”—churches face a critical challenge: resisting cultural drift while staying true to their biblical calling. Kevin Ford, in his (I can’t believe I read this over 15 years ago) book Transforming Church, outlines five key indicators that distinguish unhealthy churches from healthy ones. These comparisons—Consumerism vs. Community, Incongruence vs. Code, Autocracy vs. Shared Leadership, Cloister vs. Missional, and Inertia vs. Reinvention—offer a roadmap for leaders aiming to breathe new life into their congregations. Each pairing pits a negative cultural influence against a biblical counterforce, with a common thread tying them together: the shift from a cultural “me” to a biblical “we.” Let’s unpack these ideas and see how they can guide church revitalization.
From Consumerism to Community
Our culture loves consumption. We’re bombarded with messages that prioritize personal gain—what can I get, how can I be entertained? Unhealthy churches fall into this trap, treating members as customers to appease with flashy programs or endless events. But Ford pushes back, urging leaders to ditch the consumerism mindset. Healthy churches focus on community instead—building small groups, service teams, and even a “Third Place” (a welcoming spot beyond home and work) where people connect and belong. It’s not about feeding a spoiled generation’s whims; it’s about meeting spiritual needs through relationships. Imagine a church where people don’t just attend but truly “live” together—sharing life, not just pews.
From Incongruence to Code
Ever been to a church that says one thing but does another? That’s incongruence—when values and actions don’t align. It’s a recipe for confusion and distrust. Healthy churches, Ford argues, operate with a clear “code”—a shared understanding of their DNA, their core identity. Leaders must know what makes their church unique and protect it, even as they adapt. Change is good, but as the saying goes, don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Revitalization doesn’t mean erasing history; it means building on what’s already good. A church that knows itself can evolve without losing its soul.
From Autocracy to Shared Leadership
Unhealthy churches often lean on a single, top-down voice—think of the pastor as the lone dictator calling all the shots. It’s efficient, sure, but it stifles growth and burns out leaders. Ford champions shared leadership instead, where pastors collaborate with others, distributing responsibility and tapping into diverse gifts. This isn’t just practical; it’s biblical (Ephesians 4:11-12). A healthy church empowers its people, not just its pulpit. For revitalization, this means trusting the congregation to co-own the mission—less “my way or the highway,” more “our way together.”
From Cloister to Missional
Some churches turn inward, becoming cloisters—safe havens where members hide from the world. It’s comfortable, but it’s not what God intended. Ford insists that healthy churches are missional, seeing every member as a missionary wherever they are—work, home, or the coffee shop. Forget the idea that only “career missionaries” carry the gospel; we’re all sent (John 20:21). Revitalization happens when a church stops retreating and starts engaging, equipping its people to live out their faith daily. The world isn’t just a mission field for the few—it’s the calling of the many.
From Inertia to Reinvention
Finally, Ford hits on what I’d argue is the linchpin of revitalization: overcoming inertia. Unhealthy churches get stuck, clinging to “how we’ve always done it” until they fade into irrelevance. Healthy churches reinvent themselves, adapting to a changing world through strategic planning. This doesn’t mean chasing trends for the sake of coolness—it’s about staying faithful while staying fresh. A church that can’t evolve risks death by stagnation. Reinvention keeps the mission alive, ensuring the gospel speaks to today’s needs, not yesterday’s habits.
The Heart of It All
Ford’s five indicators boil down to a simple truth: unhealthy churches mirror a selfish culture, while healthy ones reflect a selfless God. The “me” focus of consumerism, autocracy, and inertia pulls us inward; the “we” of community, shared leadership, and mission pushes us outward. For leaders serious about revitalization, this is the challenge—intentionally connect your church to its community, clarify its identity, empower its people, send them out, and keep adapting. It’s not easy in a world of I-everything, but it’s the path to a thriving, biblical church.
So, where’s your church on this spectrum? Are you feeding a “me” culture or building a “we” mission? The answers might just spark the renewal you’ve been praying for.